If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. safe distance from cell tower appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. https://fnote.me/edit/Z5hAr2?t=true has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.